Skip to content
The Crossbencher

Today’s News3 August 2026 at 21:31

Trump calls UK 'bankrupt' and backs Burnham on drilling after phone call

The Crossbencher Newsdesk

Share on XWhatsAppFacebookEmail

Ben Wicks · Unsplash

Donald Trump has described Britain as "bankrupt" and called for drilling to resume in the North Sea, following a phone call with Andy Burnham. The former US president told GB News he was "very impressed" with the Greater Manchester mayor and said Burnham was "surrounded terrific" - though the exact context of that phrase remains unclear.

Trump's intervention comes as Burnham positions himself as a Labour figure willing to talk to international leaders directly, a role no metro mayor has attempted before. The Independent reports Trump is pressing for North Sea drilling to restart, which would cut directly across the government's current net-zero trajectory. GB News carried Trump's "bankrupt" comment without additional context on what metric he was using.

brown concrete building under blue sky during daytime
brown concrete building under blue sky during daytime · Chris Curry · Unsplash

The category doing work here is "bankrupt" - a word that means a specific legal state but is now deployed as political shorthand for fiscal stress. Britain is not insolvent in any technical sense: it can still borrow, still services its debt, still issues its own currency. What Trump likely means is that the debt-to-GDP ratio is high and the growth rate is low - but calling that "bankruptcy" is to diagnose a chronic condition as an acute crisis. The conflation is useful if you want to argue for a reset, less so if you want to describe the state of things accurately.

Meanwhile, GB News also reports that Republic, the anti-monarchy campaign group, has praised Burnham's proposal for a written constitution as "laying groundwork to abolish the monarchy" - a reading Burnham has not endorsed. The claim ties two separate reforms together: codifying the rules of government, and changing who sits at the top of it. One does not require the other, but the framing suggests it might.

What to watch: whether Burnham responds to Trump's characterisation, and whether the government addresses the "bankrupt" claim directly or lets it sit.

Sources and receipts (8) +

What do you think?

Sign in — it's free to add your take, reply, and vote on others.

No takes yet. Be the first to make the argument.

← All of today’s news

The daily edition

The day, with the receipts attached.

One email a day: today’s quiz, the Bench question, the argument and what broke - every figure with its source. Free, and it saves your streak. Stop it any time from one link at the bottom of it.

No password, no confirmation hoop - the stop link is in every issue. Just want the weekly editorial? →